Skip to Main Content

NECHE23: Standard Two

STANDARD TWO: Planning and Evaluation

Workroom resources are located in the left column below. The full self-study is below on the right, followed by the standard itself

Standard Two Resources: Planning

University Planning
Academic Affairs Planning
Enrollment Management Planning
Student Affairs Planning
Finance and Administration Planning
Division of Justice, Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion
Massachusetts Department of Higher Education Planning Materials

Standard Two Resources: Evaluation

Performance Metrics
External Reviews and Program Accreditation
Significant Institutional Studies
IPEDS Feedback Reports


The institution undertakes planning and evaluation to accomplish and improve the achievement of its mission and purposes.  It identifies its planning and evaluation priorities and pursues them effectively.  The institution demonstrates its success in strategic, academic, financial, and other resource planning and the evaluation of its educational effectiveness.

2.1 Planning and evaluation are systematic, comprehensive, broad-based, integrated, and appropriate to the institution.  They involve the participation of individuals and groups responsible for the achievement of institutional purposes and include external perspectives.  Results of planning and evaluation are regularly communicated to appropriate institutional constituencies.  The institution allocates sufficient resources for its planning and evaluation efforts.

2.2 Institutional research is sufficient to support planning and evaluation.  The institution systematically collects and uses data necessary to support its planning efforts and to enhance institutional effectiveness. (See also 8.6, 8.7).


2.3 The institution plans beyond a short-term horizon, including strategic planning that involves realistic analyses of internal and external opportunities and constraints.  The results of strategic planning are implemented in all units of the institution through financial, academic, enrollment, and other supporting plans.

2.4 The institution plans for and responds to financial and other contingencies, establishes feasible priorities, and develops a realistic course of action to achieve identified objectives.  Institutional decision-making, particularly the allocation of resources, is consistent with planning priorities.

2.5 The institution has a demonstrable record of success in implementing the results of its planning.


2.6 The institution regularly and systematically evaluates the achievement of its mission and purposes, the quality of its academic programs, and the effectiveness of its operational and administrative activities, giving primary focus to the realization of its educational objectives.  Its system of evaluation is designed to provide valid information to support institutional improvement.  The institution’s evaluation efforts are effective for addressing its unique circumstances.  These efforts use both quantitative and qualitative methods.

2.7 The institution’s principal evaluation focus is the quality, integrity, and effectiveness of its academic programs.  Evaluation endeavors and systematic assessment are demonstrably effective in the improvement of academic offerings, student learning, and the student experience.  Systematic feedback from students, former students, and other relevant constituencies is a demonstrable factor in institutional improvement.

2.8 The institution has a demonstrable record of success in using the results of its evaluation activities to inform planning, changes in programs and services, and resource allocation.

577 Western Ave, Westfield, MA 01086

Contact Us